Friday, 10 March 2017

Researching Your Documentary

Sebastian Black                     BTEC Media 60 Credit Subsidiary Diploma


Researching You Documentary

The social issue I will be investigating will be the British Debate Over Veils. The purpose of this documentary is to talk about the issues regarding the veils. I want to know how it effects the people in the college & what their views are. The impact this documentary will have on me is that I will become more educated & aware of what is going on. Veils have never been an issue in my family because nobody wears them unless they are praying however I want to know how it effects those who wear them. For the participants, I want them to feel free to have their voice heard because this subject is often swept under a rug. Regarding the audience, I want them to learn about why these women wear their veils & that it's not them being oppressed. The individuals I could interview would be female Muslim teachers & female Muslim students. The reason why I am choosing to interview them is because the issues effect them directly. 

(A) Secondary Research into the Existing Facts:

Jeremy Browne (Liberal Democrat) - Telegraph (15th September 2013)

This article talks about Mr. Browne suggesting that "there should be a national debate about whether the state should step in to protect young women for having the veil 'imposed' on them."
 He feels 'instinctively uneasy' about banning the behaviour however he feels that action should be taken to protect the freedom of young Muslim girls. Nick Clegg  (former Deputy Prime Minister) said he may support banning veils in classrooms. He said: “My own view, I don’t think we should end up like different countries where we tell people how they go about their business. I do think there is an issue with teachers in the classroom… that might be an area where a full veil might be inappropriate.


The Islamic Veil Across Europe - BBC (31st January 2017)

This article talks about the different issues that have happened in Europe regarding the veil. In Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel stated that the full-faced veils should be prohibited in Germany "wherever it is legally possible". Half of Germany's 16 states went to ban teachers from wearing headscarves. In Hesse the ban includes civil servants too. 

In Austria, coalition agreed to ban full-faced veils (Niqabs & Burkas) in public spaces like courts & schools. They were also considering a general ban on state employees wearing the headscarf & other religious symbols. "Only an estimated 150 women wear the full Niqab in Austria but tourism officials expressed fears that the measures would also deter visitors from the Gulf as it would apply at ski resorts, as much as the capital, Vienna."

France became the first European country to ban the full-face veil in public places on April 11th 2011. Nicolas Sarkozy who brought the ban said that veils oppress women & were "not welcome"
The penalty for wearing a veil is 150 Euros (£133/$217). Anyone found forcing a woman to wear a veil will risk a fine of 30, 000 Euros. 

In December 2012, Belgium's Constitutional Court rejected appeals for the ban to be annulled stating that it did not violate human rights. 


UK Government & Parliament Petition - "Ban the Wearing of a Burka, Any Full or Partial From Face Coverings in Public" 

This petition required 100, 000 signatures in order for it to be successful. It only received 19, 765 signatures. This source isn't as reliable as the others because it is not factual. The Government responded to this petition stating "Face covering can be worn in public places for a variety of legitimate reasons. The Government has no intention of making it a criminal offence to wear face covering. Where face coverings are used for the purpose of concealing identity, section 60AA of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 provides police officers with the power to remove them. The police may also remove face coverings during a stop and search or following an arrest. The Government considers these powers to be both proportionate to citizens’ civil liberties and sufficient to allow the police to protect the public from harm." - Home Office. The petition is closed. 


On the other hand of this petition:

David Cameron Supports Removal of Muslim Veils in Schools - Independent (19th January 2016)

'If you need to be able to see someone’s face at the border, then I will always back the authority and institution that have put in place proper and sensible rules'

This article talks about how David Cameron supports "proper & sensible rules" however he does not advocate the nation-wide ban on full-face coverings. Andy Burnham (Shadow Home Secretary) commented "His clumsy and simplistic approach to challenging extremism is unfairly stigmatising a whole community. There is a real danger that it could end up driving further radicalisation, rather than tackling it."

(B) Secondary Research into the Format & Possible Distribution of your Documentary:

Inside Islam: What a Billion Muslims  Really Think

This documentary is based in America. It talks about the religion itself. The documentary talks about the effect after 9/11 & how the Muslim didn't want to be associated with the terrorists. The Muslims were scared for their safety. Muslims finally speak out on how 9/11 effected them, not just with what people were doing to them but how they felt on the inside. 9/11 triggered these hate crimes worldwide. 


Ask A Muslim (Doc Web Series) 1 - "Burqas & Beards" - Youtube

This web series is about American Muslims. They are asked questions why do Muslims have beards & why the women wear Burqas. They state that it's not an obligation to have beards or wear Burqas. The Burqas aren't a requirement to wear however it shows modesty. It depends on where you are from & what rules are implied on you however a lot of these women are not oppressed. The women talk about how they aren't forced to wear the headscarves because they feel God inside of them already however they do not want negative attention from men.


Woman Wearing Niqab Dominates Uncovered Muslim in Ban the Burqa Debate - CNN (7th March 2012)

This debate talks about whether women are forced to wear Niqabs or not. The presenter states that the first amendment in the US is the right to practice any religion. The opposer states that it's not right because people will do what they want & say that it's part of their religion. 


My documentary won't be an argument, it will be similar to What a Billion Muslims Think. It will just be Muslim women talking about why they wear the Burqas, how it effects them & what they think of the ban. The subjects will voice their views just like Ask a Muslim. 

In term of distribution, my documentary can be put on Youtube & Vimeo. To have it shown on TV, I could send a TV channel the link to my documentary & see their response. 

For funding, I could apply for documentary funding from the BFI. To apply for the fund, you need an account with the BFI. You can fill in an application online. After that there will be an assessment period. You will need to have a strong story & characters to be considered. Before pitching your idea, there will be a pitching workshop that the shortlisted people will attend, it is not mandatory however it is advised. 

Primary Research, Summary & Ethical Concerns

1) Are you aware of the ban of Niqabs (Full-faced veils) in France & other European countries? Y/N

2) "Full-faced veils should be banned in the UK" Do you agree with this statement?

3) Do you know anyone who has been a victim of racism because they wear a Hijab?

4) Do you believe that Britain supports religious freedom?

5) What is your opinion on women who wear full-faced veils?

6) Do you believe that women who wear full-faced veils are oppressed? Y/N

7) Would you feel content if your teacher wore a Niqab? Y/N

8) Do you think full-faced veils encourage terrorism? Please explain your answer. 

https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/HRRV9N3

Results:

Overall, more people were aware of the ban of Niqabs in France & other parts of Europe, over half of the people who completed the questionnaire believed that full-faced veils should not be banned in the UK, half of the people who took the questionnaire knew someone who had been a victim of racism & the other half didn't know anybody. Over half of the people thought that Britain supports religious freedom whereas a quarter & a bit believed that Britain doesn't support religious freedom. About 3/4's of the people who took the survey believed that women who wear full-face veils are not oppressed whereas the rest believed that they are. 82% would be content if their teacher wore a Niqab whereas the rest would not feel content. In terms of the written responses majority of the people who took the questionnaire responded positively towards muslim women who wear full faced veils & whether or not they believe that full-faced veils encourage terrorism however there are a small percentage of people who said that they are against women who wear Niqabs & they do believe that Niqabs encourage terrorism.

Ethical Considerations:

Because this is a very sensitive topic, I would have to go about the questions lightly to ensure the subjects of the documentary feel safe. Due to a number of people portraying Islam in a negative light, it is understandable for the subjects to feel like I am doing the same thing however I will have to ensure them that I won't be. I will have to use correct terminology to not offend anybody. The subjects of the documentary will be aware of the questions before I ask them just to make sure they are comfortable with the questions. I will also need to ensure that I have backed up my factual information with evidence to make sure I am not giving the audience the wrong information. 

Tuesday, 21 February 2017

Assignment Task One: Analysing the Purposes & Content of Other Documentaries

Sebastian Black                  BTEC Media 60 Credit Subsidiary Diploma     Monday 6th February 2017



The two documentaries I will be analysing are Undefeated & The Pedophile Next Door.

Undefeated was directed by Daniel Lindsay & T. J. Martin. The film was produced by Rich Middlemas, Glen Zipper, Daniel Lindsay, Seth Gordon & Ed Cunningham. The production companies involved in this film were Zipper Bros Films, Spitfire Pictures, Five Smooth Stones Productions & Level 22 Productions. The documentary was distributed by the Weinstein Company (USA) & Alliance Films (Canada) & Dogwoof. The film can be watched on iTunes, Google Play or be bough on DVD via the Dogwoof website.The film was released on March 2011 in the South by Southwest film festival.  Sean Combs joined as an executive producer in February 2012 with the intentions of working with the Weinstein Company on a remake. On February 26th 2012, Undefeated won an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature which made T. J. Martin the first film director of African-American descent to win an Oscar for a feature length film. 

In terms of narrative, the subjects of the documentary inform us as the audience what is happening. Everything that happened in this documentary was not intentional, it naturally happened. This is what made the film a success. In my opinion the documentary is multistrand because we are following Bill Courtney, Montrail 'Money' Brown, O.C. Brown & Chavis Daniels. The main issue is that the coach (Bill Courtney) is trying to help the boys in his team on the field & out of the field. He's not only telling them to win, he's also giving them valuable life lessons, telling them to study hard in order to get into college so they can make a better life for themselves. 

Undefeated is an observational documentary. The filmmakers aren't seen as present in this documentary, they have no input on what goes on in the documentary, everything naturally happens. This documentary almost feels like a sports film because it follows certain conventions of a sports film. Observational documentaries tend to be rushed around which is what happens in this documentary. The documentary follows through the Manassa football team & their struggles with getting into college & winning football games because of their past. This documentary doesn't ask questions as if it were an interview. The cinematographer is there & he/she starts filming & let things happen as they normally would. There are found footages displayed in this film when relaying back to previous games. These found footages show us what the previous players were like. There's also found footage of O.C. Brown playing a football game which shows how he stands out against the other players. In terms of lighting, Undefeated used the natural light that is around the location. There are no additional lights used to enhance this documentary in any way. The most lighting there's been is during the football game where the stadium lights are on. The speed of cuts fluctuate. During the football games the cuts are very fast to represent an actual sports film whereas when Courtney is lecturing the team, the cuts are slow, sometimes there aren't even cuts, the cinematographer pans across the room to show the team collectively. When the cinematographer shows them collectively to me it shows that they are all being praised or they are all at fault. There are times when the cuts are on individual players & that is because whatever is going on is directly linked to them. 

The purpose of Undefeated is to change the attitudes of the audience & the people who are in the documentary, especially the players. The stereotypes of young black males in general are that they are in gangs, they are violent, they sell or do drugs however this documentary gives another perspective on these male's lives. Most of these male's live with their grandmothers because they've been abandoned by their parents. We are shown in the documentary that they help their family's out with the chores & they are no way involved with gangs or any crime. Their family want them to study & work hard to get to a better place. A lot of them struggle with their education because they haven't received enough help & support. Coach Courtney ensures that the players do well academically or else he won't let them play in the football games. This documentary is all about changing attitudes because we learn that we need to push young people, especially young people from poorer backgrounds. They may not feel like they want to go far in life because we as society have stereotyped them & put them down. We are the ones who have taken the American dream away from these young men & we are the ones who are going to give those dreams back.

The impact of the documentary allowed Money to get attention & receive a random scholarship. Chavis's attitude changed. We saw him as a young offender in the beginning but through the support from coach Courtney, he became a respectable young man. He originally had a problem with O.C. however towards the end he showed kindness & compassion towards O.C. O.C. received positive attention from colleges. He was originally working towards a scholarship & through the documentary he had the courage to continue working hard, even when he injured his leg on the field. Coach Courtney was very busy during the documentary, he stated that he didn't get to spend time with his family & once the documentary was over he returned back home to coach in his son's school. He regretted the fact that he couldn't spend time with his children. He was more of a dad to the football team than he was to his own children. In terms of society, we learned that a scholarship cannot be given if the student does not have high enough grades for it which is a problem for these young black children because they are always put down because of the colour of their skin or where they live.  We understand that the education system is not great, especially for young black people because they are seen as failures & there's no need to spend a lot of money on their education if they;'re not going to get anywhere with their lives. The school developed a lot of pride because of the documentary. Coach Courtney misses being the football coach in Manassa however he loves his current job.

The Pedophile Next Door (Dir. Rudolph Herzog & Steve Humphries) 2014 is a documentary currently on Netflix. Steve Humphries is a well know director, he has directed 9/11: The Lost Hero (2013), The 9/11 Surfer (2012), The Miracle of Carriage 346 (2008) & many more. This documentary has also aired on TV in the UK.

This documentary talks about about issues around pedophilia in the UK. It also touches upon whether or not pedophilia is a mental illness & how we as a society can prevent it or even help the people suffering with this illness. The documentary is multistrand, it gives insight of how the victims of this crime were effected, when they were effected & how they are doing now. It also gives us insight on the perpetrators. In terms of Todorv's theory of narrative, it does follow a non linear narrative. It's not obvious that it is a non linear narrative because there are reenactments of the past with Steve Humphries narrating so it does take us to the past which makes it non linear. There are factual information being given to the audience through the narrator. We see interviews of victims & it slowly goes towards the one suffering with the illness. At the end the narrative becomes lighter & there seems to be a solution & a message. The message is that we as society need to rethink our views of pedophiles & we get to know a pedophile who has not acted upon his wishes & he goes to get treatment for his illness.

Unlike Undefeated, The Pedophile Next Door has a presenter which is Steve Humphries. We know he is there, we see him, he asks the questions. We see Steve Humphries interviews a range of people. He also disappears off screen whilst the professionals are talking, he lets them talk however his narration is still there. The documentary uses found footage to relate to what is narrated. This creates an emotional response with the audience as pedophilia is a provocative subject. In terms of placements, the victims & the pedophile are filmed in the comfort of their own homes & in their surroundings whereas the professionals are filmed in their working environment.

The Pedophile Next Door was made to raise awareness & to change our attitudes using scientific research & testimonies from different people. Being a provocative subject it can be hard to change our attitudes. This documentary talks about how pedophila can develop in the womb or it can be due to past abuse. In the past research showed that pedophila was predominantly present in lower class families however it has changed overtime & this documentary tries to explain that anyone can be a pedophile, it doesn't matter who they are. The two victims give different perspectives on their abuse. One was a female, another was a male. The male states that he was 'beautifully groomed' & he didn't know it was wrong. The female however talks about her suffering & pain. This gives us two different perspectives. It could tell us that children are not educated enough on what is wrong & what is right.

When this documentary was released it received a lot of negative feedback especially on social media (twitter) because pedophila was compared to diabetes. A lot of people who have diabetes complained to channel for because of the comparison. The documentary however did not achieve its purpose. Because of how touchy the subject is I believe that no matter how many documentaries are made on this subject. they will never achieve their purpose because it is down to society to change their views. The documentary can only guide us as society but because we are hardwired to believe that pedophiles are monster's, it's hard to change that view.  The impact of the documentary caused a mass protest. People stated that they want the pedophiles dead even if they haven't committed a crime. It got to the point where these pedophiles had to move to a different part of the country. Authorities became worried because they felt that the stress would make them relapse into abusing children because they felt that there was an expectation on them to be the way that society thinks they are. The impact for the filmmakers was positive. They became more educated & open minded on the subject through interviews through different people. Steve Humphries started to understand that pedophiles aren't monster through interviewing a pedophile. We learn that we have to listen & understand pedophiles regardless of how hard it may be. Authorities are trying to talk to pedophiles before they are known offenders. They want to encourage pedophiles to come out & receive help in order to prevent them from committing crimes. The female victim of child sexual abuse became a social worker to help children safe because no one was there to protect her. Pedophile Eddie has been accepted into a treatment facility in Europe to help him with his illness. He thanks the documentary for helping him get to this stage.